Image of some stadiums that will be used for the 2026. but must be converted to natural grass.

2026 FIFA World Cup Turf War Natural Grass v Artificial Turf

2026 FIFA World Cup requirement for natural grass fields has sparked a turf war among players, coaches, and venue owners. In this article, we explore why FIFA insists on natural grass, the challenges of switching from artificial turf to real grass. And what the environmental cost and monetary cost will be for FIFA compliance for venue owners.

2026 FIFA World Cup Turf War Natural Grass v Artificial Turf

2026 World Cup Turf War sparked by FIFA who is mandating the use of Natural Grass v Artificial Turf surfaces at the 2026 World Cup has triggered a debate among athletes, coaches, and venue owners.

In this article, we delve into the rationale behind FIFA’s position, the obstacles associated with transitioning synthetic turf pitches to real grass, and the potential implications for the expenses linked to hosting the 2026 World Cup.

Image of SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles and information about why natural grass in better than artificial grass

Researchers inspect World Cup 2026 fields ahead of qualifying matches

Their mission: ensuring that the playing surfaces for the world’s most-watched sporting spectacle, jointly hosted by the United States, Mexico, and Canada, align with international soccer standards.

The inspection results will determine if any stadiums need to improve their playing surfaces to meet FIFA’s standards. Subsequently, the stadiums will receive a grace period to implement the necessary changes before the World Cup begins.

Image of a Team of researchers engaged in their own preliminary phase of testing for consistent playing surface.

Seven Stadiums Currently Feature Artificial Turf

Seven of the 16 stadiums selected to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup will need to transition from artificial turf to natural grass in order to meet FIFA’s requirements.

These stadiums are: Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, the AT&T Stadium in Dallas, the NRG Stadium in Houston, the BC Place in Vancouver, the MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, the Gillette Stadium in Boston, the Lumen Field in Seattle and the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles.

Image of the SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles which is undergoing testing and analysis for the world cup in 2026

Why does FIFA prefer natural grass?

Natural grass is the preferred playing surface for FIFA World Cups because it is more consistent, predictable, and safer for players than artificial turf.

Artificial turf has seen decades of use in sports, but its suitability for football remains a topic of debate. Third-generation systems, which combine sand and rubber, make artificial turf a viable alternative for football.

FIFA recognises that artificial turf can be a good surface for developing football, as it is weather-resistant and durable. However, there is a wide range of quality among third-generation artificial turf systems.

How will stadiums implement this grass pitches?

Image of a football on a grass football pitch. with a caption saying why doe FIFA prefer natural grass

Rather than laying trays of grass on the existing turf, the approach is to remove the stadium’s artificial turf. They will set up a temporary field with both grass and shallow turf profiles for proper drainage on this surface.

A key challenge is growing the grass within eight weeks. The research team is currently testing factors like temperature, rainfall, sunlight, and other variables to find the best growth conditions for each stadium.

Currently, none of the stadiums with artificial turf, set to switch to natural grass for the 2026 World Cup, have plans to keep natural grass afterward. In fact, they’ll need a temporary solution to meet World Cup standards.

What is the Environmental impact?

The environmental impact of using natural grass pitches at the World Cup is complex. Natural grass absorbs carbon dioxide and biodegrades. Making a greener choice is essential.

image of natural grass highlighting the conversion of artificial turf fields to grass for the 2026 World Cup is a complex and costly undertaking. However, FIFA believes that the benefits of natural grass outweigh the costs.

However, natural grass has ecological drawbacks. It requires a lot of water for maintenance, and it can be difficult to grow in certain climates. The use of pesticides and fertilizers to keep these lawns green can also harm the environment.

Image of water spraying highlighting the fact that approximately 50,000 liters of water daily is needed for  each stadium in the world cup

During the World Cup, taking care of the natural grass fields requires a lot of resources, like approximately 50,000 liters of water daily for each stadium.

They’re teaming up with host cities to create eco-friendly water management plans for the stadiums and reducing the use of chemicals by working with stadium operators

FIFA commits to eco-friendly turf solutions and invests in researching sustainable options. They support studies on hybrid turf systems that mix real grass with synthetic fibers, helping save water and reduce pesticide needs for pitch maintenance.

image of people looking at reports related to research for eco-friendly turf solutions.

FIFA is actively supporting research for eco-friendly turf solutions. This involves funding studies on hybrid turf systems, which blend real grass with synthetic fibers. This innovation lowers water and pesticide usage, ensuring a greener playing field.

What will be the cost of converting stadiums to grass?

Converting a stadium from artificial turf to grass can vary in cost. Factors like field size, grass type, and local climate play a role. The responsibility of covering this cost falls on a venue.

image showing coins relating to the cost of converting a stadium from artificial turf to grass

However many stadium owners are not happy

Reports have indicated controversy surrounding Stan Kroenke, the owner of SoFi Stadium, for his decision not to fund essential changes required for the 2026 World Cup. Some argue that he prioritizes his finances over the World Cup’s needs, while others support his choice, stating he is not obligated to finance FIFA-benefiting modifications.

It’s important to know that FIFA doesn’t mandate host cities to cover stadium modification costs. However, they do require all stadiums to meet their World Cup standards, like a specific-sized natural grass pitch.

For SoFi Stadium, these modifications involve removing seating and luxury boxes to accommodate a wider pitch, incurring significant costs. Kroenke reportedly declined to foot the bill.

It is uncertain if Stan Kroenke will reconsider. His refusal to fund SoFi Stadium changes hampers the city’s 2026 World Cup bid. FIFA’s demand for natural grass fields is a big task for host cities, with expensive stadium conversions and climate challenges. Yet, FIFA sees the benefits of natural grass as outweighing the cost.
#FIFA2026WorldCup #WorldCupTurfWar #NaturalGrass #ArtificialTurf #FootballPitch #SoccerField #FIFAStandards #Sustainability #Cost #Controversies

This was a report by Dynamic Sport marketing. Connecting your goals in the changing landscape of sport.

Contact us for support on freelance or a flexible basis if you want to reach sports fans for your brand:
Email us @ Dynamic Sport Marketing Or call us: +31 0625568958

For a full list of our services click this link for an overview of our easy consulting services

Follow us on :

Twitter:

Linkedin:

Website: